Languages:de en es fr

ChessBase Shop

Shopping Cart

0 Items

€0.00

ChessBase Magazine Magazine

€19.95

Add to Cart

€16.76 without VAT (for customers outside the EU)
$19.78 (without VAT)

ChessBase Magazine 142

Name: ChessBase Magazine 142
Price: 19.95 EUR
Availability: InStock

Product

Description

Add to Cart

€19.95
€16.76 without VAT (for customers outside the EU)
$19.78 (without VAT)

Au revoir, Amber! The 20th and last edition of this classic tournament with its blindfold and rapid chess games, won this year by Levon Aronian, constitutes one of the main themes of this issue. On the DVD there is commentary, e.g., by Magnus Carlsen on his victory over the world champion, and Vugar Gashimov explains the subtleties of his attacking win over Vladimir Kramnik. Our second tournament highlight is the European championship in Aix-les-Bains, which is traditionally contested in the form of a super-strong Open. The three medal winners (Vladimir Potkin, Judit Polgar and Radoslaw Wojtaszek) have all annotated their best games for you. We have yet another highlight in Ruslan Ponomariov’s comments on his games in the Russian Team Championship. With its 14 openings articles, the DVD offers a whole host of suggestions for your repertoire, in addition to training databases to sharpen your strategic and tactical instincts.

Languages:	German, English
Published:	May 2011
Delivery:	Download
Level:	Tournament player , Professional

	Introductory videos In hisintroductory video Hamburg grandmaster Karsten Müller introduces in his accustomed trenchant manner the contents of this issue and casts a first glance over selected highlights such as Magnus Carlsen’s victory with Black over Vishy Anand or the way the new European Champion Vladimir Potkin defeated Ter Sahakyan. On this occasion, Müller has selected from the openings articles two repertoire suggestions for Black, on one hand a weapon against the Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation and on the other a solid setup against the Evans Gambit. What Karsten Müller does not mention is his own endgame column and his detailed endgame analyses in video format, in which games from the Amber Tournament are also put under the microscope. These too are articles which you should on no account miss!
	In his video retrospectiveDorian Rogozenco also brings together for you the tournament highlights of the past months. For example, he demonstrates for you some tactical subtleties from the game Jobava-Potkin, which was important in deciding who would win the European championship. From the Amber Tournament the Romanian grandmaster presents some moments from the blindfold game Kramnik-Ivanchuk. Follow Rogozenco’s analysis and be prepared to be surprised at how accurately these strong players are able to handle such complicated positions even in blindfold chess!
12.03-24.03.2011 Board design "Blindall" Aronian against Carlsen	Amber Blindfold and Rapid Chess Tournament 20 years ago the twice world correspondence chess champion and chess patron Joop van Oosterom made a present to the world of chess of a unique world class tournament in which the players measure their powers in a very special way. The participants met each other in mini-matches, consisting of one game of blindfold chess and one of rapid chess in each case. Luxury accommodation in top class hotels and the circumstance that they could not lose any Elo points contributed to the creation of a special and tense atmosphere. After twenty years it is all over, because for health reasons the sponsor is stopping his support. For the third time it was Levon Aronian who wrote his name into the list of victors. He set this up with his excellent performance in the blindfold section of the tournament: 8.5 out of 11. Magnus Carlsen was well ahead of his competitors in the rapid chess section with 9.5 out of 11, but that was not enough to compensate for his average performance in blindfold chess.
Gashimov,V - Kramnik,V Position after 9.g4	"It's great pity that it was the last Amber tournament". These few simple words by Vugar Gashimov at the start of the analysis of his game against Kramnik express the feelings of the participants in this farewell tournament. On his second appearance the Azerbaijani achieved a very decent result in the middle of the field. In the aforesaid game against the ex world champion Gashimov side-stepped the endgame of a Berlin Defence with 4.Qe2 and his 7.Ba4 was almost an innovation (there is only one previous game, Adams-Kramnik, Blitz-WCh 2007). With 9.g4 (see diagram) Gashimov laid his cards on the table, and after Kramnik’s 9...Nh7 he continued his attack with the exchange on d5, the deployment of his knight to e4 and finally the thrust g5. In his analysis Gashimov explains the details of his strategy and shows the point at which the ex world champion made the decisive mistake. Click on the link under the diagram and carry out White’s attack aided by the comments of the winner.
Anand,V - Carlsen,M Position after 28.Rh1	The mini-match between Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand constitutes a good example of the Norwegian’s play during this tournament. In the blindfold game his Grand-Prix Attack really backfired. After a mere 10 moves he had isolated tripled pawns on the c-file and no realistic claim on any compensation for them. Carlsen did go on to hold his own in the rook ending but finally missed out on the chance to draw. In the rapid game on the other hand he seized an initiative right from the opening – Anand too avoided the Berlin Defence with 4.Qe2 – and exploited a mistake in the world champion’s defensive play to achieve a breakthrough on the kingside, a decisive penetration of his pieces down the g-file. Click onAnand,V - Carlsen,M and enjoy the comments by the exceptional Norwegian player.
Carlsen,M - Aronian,L Position before 18.Nxf7	On the DVD you will find all the games from the Amber Tournament, many of them with detailed analysis. So, for example, GM Mikhail Krasenkow annotates the top duel Carlsen-Aronian from round three. In a Grünfeld Defence with the rare 7.Qa4 Aronian innovated with the natural looking 7...a6, but missed, as Krasenkow points out, various chances of reaching direct equality. Instead of that Carlsen won the black d-pawn and in the position on the board on the left could have got a clearly advantageous ending after 18.Qc6 Bxd5 19.Qxd5 Nxe5 20.Qxd8 Rfxd8 21.dxe5. But he decided on the undoubtedly more spectacular 18.Nxf7, the result of which was a far more complex ending with an uneven distribution of material. This time fortune did not favour the brave. A few moves later Carlsen overlooked or underestimated the discovered attack 26...Ne8 and finally even had to struggle for a draw.
22.03.-02.04.2011 Title beat cakes Vladimir Potkin	European Championship in Aix-les-Bains "There are things which are more of a reason to celebrate than a birthday", was how the new European champion Vladimir Potkin summed things up when looking back over the so far greatest success of his chess career. There is no doubt that 28 year old Russian deserved his victory. From the very start he set about matters courageously (5 out of 5) and led the field on his own until round 8. The decisive step to victory in the race for the title was taken in a spectacular victory with Black in the second last round against Jobava. On the DVD Potkin analyses this game and also his victory from round 4 (see below). The fact that even among top players taking a rest from chess can have a positive effect on motivation and creativity can be seen from the performance of Judit Polgar. Still the leading woman on the world ranking list, she demonstrated courageous and sometimes speculative chess and finished in third place on the same number of points as Potkin and the silver medal winner Wojtaszek. On the DVD she annotates in detail two of her best wins.
Ter Sahakyan,S - Potkin,V Position before 27...Bxg5	Amongst the victims of Vladimir Potkin’s sequence of victories at the start was the 18 year old Armenian Ter Sahakyan. When they met in the 2008 ECh in Plovdiv things had been peaceful on both sides. In Aix-les-Bains, on the other hand, it was all very combative and in the Sicilian Paulsen Variation both players rapidly set out on an attack on the opposing king. In his analysis Vladimir Potkin explains the knight sacrifice on e5 which had been thought up in a training session with Konstantin Landa and which brought him the initiative in this game. His young opponent underestimated the potential of the subsequent black attack and moved his knights too far away from his own king. In the position on the board, after 27.c3 Potkin got in the decisive blow with 27...Bxg5 28.Qxg5 Rxc3+ and went on to win a few moves later. Click on the link under the diagram and the European champion will explain the game to you.
Jobava,B - Potkin,V Position after 16...0-0	After four draws in a row, Potkin was still in the top group before the last round but one, but to make the most of his chance he had to have a win with Black against Baadur Jobava, who also was entitled to hope for a place on the final pedestal. Here too, the players castled on different sides, but Potkin’s castling on move 16 (see diagram) turned out to be a very subtle move and in some sense decisive for the whole game. But on playing this move he not only ignored White’s “threat” of 17.Nd5, but at the same time prepared the queen sacrifice 17...cxd5 18.Nxb6 axb6. After that Black is clearly better, though this may be far beyond the horizon of the average club player. This is because, thanks to his active piece play, Black is able to generate unexpected threats against the white king. Potkin analyses in very great detail the tactical subtleties of this game, which ended after only 26 moves. After victory in this game the Russian only required a short draw with White against Polgar to win the title.
"hunger to play" Judit Polgar	"I had my hunger to play and challenge myself". These are the words of Judit Polgar in retrospect as she evaluates her attitude to chess during the European championship. There could be no better attitude for an attacking player of her stamp. And so in Aix-les-Bains, despite an unfortunate start, she wrote herself into chess history: she became the first woman ever to win a medal in the European championship. After a defeat in the sixth round at the hands of the surprisingly strong Austrian player Marcus Ragger, she appeared to be already out of the running with only 4.5 points. But then Judit Polgar followed up like a whirlwind with four spectacular victories to catch up with the leaders.
Pantsulaia,L - Polgar,J Position before 11...b5	The first victim in this series of wins was the young Georgian Levan Pantsulaia in round 7. Obviously in an attempt to get his opponent out of her preparation at an early stage, Pantsulaia came up with the unusual 4.Qc2. In her annotations, Judit Polgar pulls this move to pieces and in the game she immediately exposed its disadvantages. In the position on the board she first sacrificed the exchange with 11...b5 and then followed that up after 12.Bxa8 Qxa8 13.Nf3 with a piece sacrifice by means of 13...Nd3 – not so much because that would have been the best move objectively speaking, but "because the move looked so good and tempting" that she couldn’t help trying it out. Of course things went well. At first Pantsulaia did find the correct plan to unscramble his pieces and also correctly returned an exchange. In the long run the psychological pressure was too great and he made the decisive mistake with the move 26.Qf3. Play through this fascinating game and let Judit Polgar show you many fantastic variations.
Polgar,J - Iordachescu,V Position after 15...c4	In the penultimate round, for the first time in a tournament game Judit Polgar chose the Advance Variation against the Caro-Kann and in doing so unquestionably surprised her opponent Viorel Iordachescu. After 3...Bf5 she continued with the at first sight modest 4.Nd2 and after 4...e6 with 5.Nb3. The idea behind this knight manoeuvre is to prevent an early ...c6-c5 or at least to make it more difficult. The first critical moment arrived after 10 moves, and Iordachescu carried out what is the normally thematic c5-advance. Too soon, as Polgar remarks in her analysis. Because after the exchange on c5 and the intermediate check on b5 there followed 15.c4! (see diagram). And after 15...a6 16.cxd5 axb5 17.Rc1 Qb8 18.dxe6 fxe6 19.Qb3 Black already has his back to the wall. In this difficult position the Moldavan could not find the correct defensive strategy and finally had to allow a liquidation to a completely lost rook ending.
Wojtaszek,R - Hracek,Z Position after 16...e5	Thanks to a better tie-break score, the Polish GM Radoslaw Wojtaszek managed to push ahead of Polgar into second place. The previous youth world champion remained, like the tournament victor of Aix-les-Bains, undefeated. On the DVD he annotates his attacking victory against the Czech GM Zbynek Hracek. In the game Wojtaszek chose the setup with 4.Nf3 and 5.g3 against the Nimzo-Indian, although up till then he had not had good results with it. With the rare 7.Qc2 he prepared a positional pawn sacrifice (9.0-0), which he had studied in depth in his preparation. The plan worked, also because at the board Hracek did not always manage to find the correct solution. In position in the diagram after 16...e5 Wojtaszek obtained a decisive advantage with the exchange sacrifice 17.Rxc5 Qxc5 18.Rd5 Qb4 19.Bxe5 Re8 20.Be4! and forced his opponent to resign a few moves later. Click on the link under the diagram and be inspired by Wojtaszek’s brilliancy and his annotations.
	The numerousness of high level games at the ECh 2011 have served GM Mihail Marin for his review of the latest opening trends and ideas which he has once more put together for you. Marin concentrates on the various Sicilian Systems, the Grünfeld Defence, the Nimzo-Indian and some popular plans against the Caro-Kann (the Advance Variation both in its classical form and in the new version with 4.Nd2 and 5.Nb3 and also the Fantasy Variation).
12.04.-23.04.2011 Victory for Shshm64 Every board point counts	Russian Team Championship This year’s Russian Team Championship ended in a neck and neck race between two teams: the team with Ponomariov, Motylev, Areshchenko, Inarkiev, Bologan, full of top Russian players, Tomsk-400 led until half-way and was caught up in the eighth round by the foreign legion in the form of “Schachmagazin 64”. Surprisingly on top board for Shsm-64 was Boris Gelfand, although he had to bear in mind a considerably more important date at the candidates tournament in Kasan not long afterwards. Things were extremely close at the end. After eleven rounds the victorious team of Gelfand, Wang Hao, Caruana, Giri, Riazantsev, Grachev, Potkin, Najer was only half a board point ahead of their pursuers. New Russian team champion Fabiano Caruana and runner-up Ruslan Ponomariov have both annotated remarkable games.
Caruana,F - Areshchenko,A Position after 14...f5	In the duel between the top teams, Fabiano Caruana met Alexander Areshchenko. Against the latter’s Grünfeld Defence the Italian chose for a change the setup with 7.Nf3 thus following, e.g., the game Giri-Nepomniachtchi from Wijk 2011. On move 12 he improved on the Dutch player’s efforts with the innovation 12.d5 (after the game Giri acknowledged how good Caruana’s innovation was). After 14.f4 White’s plan was obvious: the mighty pawn centre rolled forward, and so Areshchenko’s counter 14...f5 was logical and correct. In this position (diagram) Caruana decided to sacrifice the exchange. How? After the principled 15.e5 there followed g5 16.Rg1 gxf4 and then the blow 17.Rxg7. The crux of the matter: unlike what might appear as our first impression – according to Caruana – it is White who has to struggle for equality here because it is hard to activate his forces and also his king is exposed. But just a little later the young Russian made a serious mistake and with 21...b6 even gave away a possible victory.
Ruslan Ponomariov annotates	A further pairing in the duel between the top teams was that of Gelfand,B - Ponomariov,R. Gelfand only had to appear in 4 of the 11 rounds, but this match in round 10 was one of them. And, as in his previous games, he also scored a draw. On the other hand, on the top board for Tomsk-400 Ruslan Ponomariov was a heavy point scorer and with 7.5 out of 10 he was amongst the top scorers in the championship. Against Gelfand in a Catalan he tried out after 6.0-0 dxc4 7.Qc2 the sharp and still relatively new 7...b5 (recently employed successfully by Vallejo Pons and Gustafsson). But Gelfand showed himself to be up to it and with the help of natural moves he emerged from the opening with a slight advantage. After a bad mistake by Ponomariov (21...Qe7) he could really have played for a win. But 25.Kh2? turned out to be a simple waste of time and so the Russian thankfully accepted the offer to go for a draw.
Ivanchuk,V - Ponomariov,R Position before 22...Bxf3	The game Ivanchuk-Ponomariov saw a rare variation of the Ruy Lopez (3...Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.0.-0 d6 6.c3 0-0 7.Nbd2 a6 8.Bxc6), in which the previous FIDE world champion managed to manoeuvre his pieces better. In the middlegame the Ukrainian choose a wrong and over-ambitious plan with 20.e5. It was countered immediately. Two moves later Ponomariov began his attack on the white king with the bishop breaking in on f3 (see diagram). And after 23.gxf3 Qh4 24.Re4 dxe5 25.Rd7 came the point: 25...Rg6+ 26.Kf1 and after 26...Rg2 Ivanchuk resigned, shaking his head. Click on the link under the diagram and play through the game with the analysis of the Russian super-GM.
Column Move by Move Erdogdu - Pelletier Position after 21.Nh4 Which move is the best? King has awarded points (or in some cases minus points) to six different replies.	From the opening trap to the endgame study Training in ChessBase Magazine starts with the very first moves and covers all the different phases of the game of chess. The 14 openings articles containing up-to-date analysis along with many ideas and suggestions for your repertoire can be found here or above among the links. This time Rainer Knaak’s opening Trap (including a Fritztrainer video) contains a trap from the Sicilian with 2...g6 3.d4 Bg7 (B27), and at the same time offers a whole repertoire for White against Black’s setup. You will also find in video format openings articles by Leonid Kritz (French Winawer Variation), Sam Collins (Sicilian Sveshnikov), Valeri Lilov (Sicilian Rossolimo) and Adrian Mikhalchishin (Queen’s Gambit Accepted). You will find these videos and another clip by Nigel Davies in the Fritztrainer column. In his strategy column Peter Wells deals with: "Doubled f-pawns in front of the castled king: part II – the safety of the king in its wider positional context". In Daniel King’s long running Move by Move it is a Catalan game which is up for discussion, see diagram on the left. And in their columns on tactics (subject: mini materialists) and the endgame (subject: domination) both Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller have once more brought together all that is best in recent tournament practice for you.

Opening Surveys

Grivas: Sicilian B33

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Qb6 5.Nb3 Nf6 6.Nc3 e6 7.Bd3 d6 8.0-0 a6 9.a4 Qc7

In the Hermes Variation (9.a4) the spread of the queenside by means of ...b5 is prevented, but this does not profit White to any great extent because compared to the Scheveningen System the Nb3 is badly placed and a kingside attack achieves nothing.

Postny: Sicilian B48

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Sc3 Qc7 6.Be3 a6 7.Qd2 Nf6 8.0-0-0 Bb4 9.f3 Ne5 10.Nb3 b5 11.Qe1

While winning his title, new European champion Vladimir Potkin won a very nice game against the extremely up-to-date setup with 11.Qe1, but nevertheless Evgeny Postny has discovered an advantage for White. But he also presents a good alternative for Black.

Moskalenko: French C01

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5

Viktor Moskalenko is an enthusiast of the French Defence and so it comes as no surprise that he is also unafraid of the Exchange Variation. In his article the grandmaster introduces several plans for Black.

Dembo: Evans Gambit C51

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 Bxb4 5.c3 Be7

Inspired by Jan Gustafssons DVD “Open games” Yelena Dembo offers in her contribution a complete repertoire against the Evans Gambit. According to her investigations, Black has at least a level game in all lines.

Kritz: Two Knights Defence C58

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Bd3

After 8.Bd3 White has the option, if needed, to go with his knight from g5 to e4. Kritz analyses five different replies, but none of them is completely satisfactory for Black.

Breutigam: Ruy Lopez C68

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.0-0 Bg4 6.h3 Bh5 7.g4 Bg6 8.Nxe5 Qh4 9.Qf3 f6 10.Nxg6 hxg6

With 6...Bh5 (instead of the usual 6...h5) Black offers a pawn sacrifice, which White should accept if he wants to play for an advantage. After it we soon end up in the position in the diagram, which promises Black interesting play.

Kuzmin: Anti-Slav D23

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Qc2 dxc4 5.Qxc4 Bf5 6.g3 e6 7.Bg2 Nbd7 8.0-0 Be7 9.e3 0-0 10.Rd1

The position can also arise via the Queen’s Gambit Accepted, but it is much more significant as a weapon against the Slav. Holding back Nc3 involves a few subtleties, which Alexey Kuzmin explains in his article.

Stohl: Queen's Gambit Accepted D27

1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.0-0 a6 7.Bb3

In the first part of his repertoire for White based on 7.Bb3, Igor Stohl examines a few side-lines as well as the principled 7...b5, followed by 8.a4. After that 8...c4 appears to be surprisingly strong.

Krasenkow: Semi-Slav D46

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.Bd3 0-0 8.0-0 dxc4 9.Bxc4 a6

By playing 9...a6 instead of the major alternatives 9...b5 and 9...e5, Black keeps in reserve precisely those two moves and in addition he is ready to play 9...c5 in many lines. The main variation goes 10.Rd1 b5, and according to Krasenkow’s analysis White has no advantage.

Schandorff: Queen's Gambit D52

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 Nbd7 6.e3 Qa5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Qd2 Bb4 9.Rc1 h6 10.Bh4 c5 11.Bc4

The variation with 10...c5 in the Cambridge Springs is considered promising, see also the contribution from Rogozenco in CBM 118. But in Wijk aan Zee Shirov twice had to admit defeat against the so far little played 11.Bc4.

Hazai/Lukacs: Queen's Gambit D56

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 0-0 6.e3 h6 7.Bh4 Ne4 8.Bxe7 Qxe7 9.Rc1 c6

The Lasker Variation of the Orthodox Queen’s Gambit is fashionable at the moment. Laszlo Hazai and Peter Lukacs examine 9.Rc1 which is almost always played nowadays, but White can hardly achieve anything against best play by Black.

Avrukh: Catalan E05

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 d5 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 dxc4 7.Qc2 a6 8.a4 Bd7 9.Qxc4 Bc6 10.Bf4

For a while, the move 8.a4 was unfashionable, but Boris Gelfand has been showing a few new ideas in the variation with 10.Bf4 and since then players with Black have been endeavouring, so far in vain, to achieve complete equality.

Marin: Bogo-Indian E11

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 a5 5.Nc3 b6

Mihail Marin continues his series on Bogo-Indian Variations involving...a5 with an article on 5...b6, the move which is most frequently played in the position. Black should be able to keep things level with accurate play.

Schipkov: King's Indian E83

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Nge2 a6 8.Qd2 Bd7

In an earlier article Boris Schipkov showed that after the old main move 8...Rb8 Black is faced with difficulties after 9.Rc1. Now the question is whether 8...Bd7 (intending 9.Rc1?! b5!) can represent a better alternative.

Add to Cart

Pop-up for detailed settings

Lost Password?

Create an account

ChessBase Magazine 142