|  
                          
  | Introductory videos
   					Karsten Müller  					starts his video introduction to this issue  					with two games in the Grünfeld Defence from Wijk aan Zee  					(Kramnik against L'Ami and Shirov versus Vachier-Lagrave).  					The grandmaster from Hamburg has also picked out two of the  					14 openings articles and introduces you to the essential of  					what is said in Martin Breutigam’s repertoire suggestion  					(Scandinavian with 3...Qd6 and 5...c6) and Leonid Kritz'  					analyses of sub-variations in the Two Knights Defence (1.e4  					e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nd4 or 5...b5), which  					should be particularly attractive to club players.  | 
 
  |  					GM Dorian Rogozenco heads his retrospective over the  					latest tournament highlights with the most important  					theoretical innovations from Wijk aan Zee. Ponomariov’s  					innovation with 15.a5 in the King’s Indian (Sämisch) should  					find a good foothold in opening theory, as should Giri’s  					12...c5 in the Semi-Slav (Moscow Variation). He then pays  					tribute to Nakamura’s performance in Wijk aan Zee and  					demonstrates the latter’s ability through his endgame  					victory over Shirov. Other high points from the Tata Steel  					Tournament which Rogozenco presents to you in his first  					video are Anand’s victory  					over Wang Hao and three very different games played by  					Carlsen. | 
 
  | In the second  					video 					Rogozenco introduces you to some pearls from the very strong  					open tournaments in Gibraltar and Moscow (Moscow Open and  					Aeroflot Open). As an example of Ivanchuk’s fantastic  					performance in Gibraltar,  					he explains the latter’s brilliant endgame mating attack  					against GM Lafuente. A lesson for all those who would like  					to learn how to convert a slight positional advantage!  
                        Le Quang Liem managed the tour de force of winning the  					Aeroflot Open for the second time in succession. On the DVD  					the Vietnamese GM himself annotates two of his games (see  					below). On his video Rogozenco reviews the decisive moments. | 
| 15.01.-30.01.2011   
                        A new US star? Hikaru Nakamura 
                         
  | Wijk aan Zee (A-Tournament)  					Up till now Hikaru  					Nakamura’s  					image was that of a gambler. If you take a look at the  					development of his Elo curve, then that is not very easy to  					recognise because it heads steadily upwards and has recently  					been steering towards 2800. His victory at what is perhaps  					the strongest tournament of the year in Wijk aan Zee came  					however as something of a sensation. In Carlsen, Anand,  					Kramnik and Aronian there were perhaps too many top players  					in the starting blocks to expect the US-American to top the  					bill.  
                        In the early rounds Nakamura let fly, e.g. with victories  					over Grischuk and Shirov, then maintained his place in the  					top group with further wins over the two Dutch players L'Ami  					and Smeets and took sole lead for the first time in round  					11. In the final rounds, only Vishy Anand could have  					contested his victory. But the world champion could find no  					way to win his games and once more had to content himself  					with a second place in a top tournament.  | 
  Anand,V -  					Wang Hao Position before 16.Nd4
  |  					All the games from Wijk aan Zee (including those from the  					B-group) can be found on the DVD. Two of those who were  					pipped at the post, Anand and Kramnik, have each annotated  					one of their best games for this issue.  Vishy Anand  					begins the analysis of his game against Wang Hao with a  					reference to the latter’s game against Kramnik only two  					rounds previously. In it the Chinese player had also chosen  					13...Na5 in the Sämisch Variation of the Nimzo-Indian and  					had done well with it. But Anand had simply done some  					preparation. With 14.Qb4 he deviated only very subtly from  					Kramnik’s 14.Qa4, but Wang Hao promptly fell into the trap  					with the optimistic setup 14...e5 and 15...Be6 (see  					diagram). Next came the knight sacrifice 16.Nd4, and after  					16...exd4 17.cxd4 Black already has serious practical  					problems. Click on the link under the  					diagram and play through this powerfully executed game with  					the comments of the world champion. 
                          | 
  Kramnik,V - L'Ami,E 
                        Position after 17.Qd2-g5
  | Vladimir Kramnik carried out a faultless  					attacking victory over Erwin L'Ami. At first glance, the ex  					world champion’s choice of opening did not look particularly  					aggressive: playing against a Grünfeld Defence he only  					advanced his d-pawn as far as d3 and thus deprived his  					opponent of the classical target for his attack. In the  					analysis Kramnik starts his criticism with move 7 by L'Ami.  					Instead of quick castling, he recommends that Black should  					first develop his pieces. The course of the game shows why.  					With 10.h4 Kramnik laid his cards on the table and continued  					the attack with 13.h5 and 14.hxg6. The move 17.Qg5 (see  					diagram) exploits two pins simultaneously to bring his queen  					into the attack and at the same time to cut off the black  					queen from the kingside. There followed 17...Qb6 18.Qh4  					Rfe8. With what move did Kramnik now decide the game? | 
 
  |  					The Romanian GM  					Mihail Marin presents in his openings report  					all the new ideas and trends from the world’s top  					players. Amongst the major themes are after 1.e4 the Ruy  					Lopez (e.g. Shirov’s “Tkachiev” System and the Berlin), the  					Najdorf (the Classical System with 6.Be2) and the Caro-Kann  					(above all the popular Advance Variation). In Wijk  					aan Zee White did better with 1.d4 than with 1.e4. There it  					was above all the Grünfeld Defence in its various lines  					(e.g. the Fianchetto and Exchange Variations), but there are  					interesting new ideas in many other systems too, such as,  					e.g., in the Semi-Slav (two early innovations by Anish  					Giri).   | 
  Carlsen,M - Nepomniachtchi Position after 25...Qd7
  |  					Magnus Carlsen once again had his ups and downs in Wijk.  					After two draws at the start, he lost hands down with White  					to Anish Giri’s Grünfeld Defence. It was only victories  					against the other two Dutch players that brought him back  					into contention, and when he defeated Nakamura in round 8,  					he was again a force to be reckoned with. But his next and  					decisive setback came soon after when he went down with  					White to Ian  					Nepomniachtchi. Thanks above all to his  					powerful bishop on b7, the young Russian took the initiative  					in the Sicilian Najdorf Variation with 6.Be2 after a piece  					of carelessness by Carlsen. In the position in the diagram  					he slipped in the quiet move 25...Qd7 (26.fxe4 would be  					punished by 26...Ra4). Carlsen did continue accurately, but  					finally had to surrender the exchange and the game was  					decided after the loss of the passed pawns on the queenside.  					Ian Nepomniachtchi has analysed all the phases of this  					exciting game in detail on the DVD. | 
  Shirov -  					Vachier Lagrave Position after 22.Ne2-g3
  
                         
  |  					His first appearance in Wijk aan Zee could not have worked  					out much better for the young French player Maxime Vachier-Lagrave.  					One loss was finally counter-balanced by three victories. He  					has annotated on the DVD his win with Black over the once  					more unfortunate Alexei Shirov. In a Grünfeld Defence,  					Vachier-Lagrave first surprised his opponent with the  					somewhat rare 10...Na5, and at first they followed the  					opening game from the WCh match Topalov-Anand. The French  					player deviated with 15...Bb7 and introduced a new idea in  					the form of 18...Rc8: Black does not stop his opponent from  					advancing his f-pawn and hopes in return to get sufficient  					play for his pieces. The decisive mistake was made by Shirov  					with the move 22.Ng3 (see diagram). Because after the  					surprising reply 22...Rg8 the knight is simply misplaced.  					The French player then brought his knight to the effective  					post on e5 and continued with the decisive advance of his  					d-pawn. | 
| 15.01.-30.01.2011   
                        Back to the old? Luke McShane
  | Wijk aan Zee (B-Tournament)  					A category 17 B-Tournament is only possible in Wijk. With  					Wojtaszek, Navara, Fressinet and Efimenko there were in the  					field four players with an Elo rating above 2700. Victory  					went to one of the "newcomers" in the widest possible sense  					of the term: Luke McShane only just properly returned to  					professional chess a few months ago. As in London he also  					came up with some courageous chess and was rewarded with a  					shared first place. He and David Navara will be both able to  					measure themselves against the world’s best in next year’s  					A-Tournament.  | 
  Li,C -  					McShane,L Position after 16.Bb5
  |  					McShane laid the foundations for his success right at the  					start. His first round victory over Wouter Spoelman was  					followed by two further wins against Chao Li and Vladislav  					Tkachiev. The English player was successful against the  					Chinese one in a King’s Indian with h3. After McShane’s  					5...a6 and 8...e6 the protagonists were already almost in  					virgin theoretical territory, and Li commenced an open  					struggle with the pawn sacrifice 16.Bb5 (see diagram).  					McShane picked up the gauntlet and chose in 16...Nxe4 the  					most complicated reply. After the exchange of queens the  					powerful white pieces developed massive pressure in  					conjunction with the rook on the e-file, But the English  					player’s position stood up to it. McShane finally exploited  					a moment of carelessness by his opponent (33.a5) to simplify  					the position and to liquidate to a won endgame. | 
  McShane,L -  					Tkachiev,V Position after 23...Bd6
  |  					The following day McShane opted for a less explosive opening  					(8.d3 in the Ruy Lopez Archangelsk Variation) against the  					European champion of 2007, Vladislav Tkachiev. In his  					analysis he explains why he likes playing the Ruy Lopez with  					White and why he considers the placing of the bishop on b7  					in this specific variation to be less than optimal. After  					winning a pawn on f4 McShane decided in the position on the  					board on the left to liquidate to “a position with a secure  					advantage” and captured on h6 with the knight. But after  					24...Qxh6 25.Bxf7+ Kh7 26.Qxh6+ Kxh6 27.Bxe8 Rxe8 28.f3  					there arose an extremely unusual position, in which White  					has a rook and three pawns for the bishop pair. The  					retrospective view of the future tournament winner is  					critical, because although he managed to decide the game in  					his favour after painstaking manoeuvring McShane feels that  					White’s advantage after this liquidation is pretty dubious. | 
| 25.01.-03.02.2011   Vassily Ivanchuk A rock amongst the breakers
  |  					Gibraltar Chess Festival   					There are not many of the top players who are bold enough to  					enter a very strong open tournament. When you get down to  					it, the opposition consists mainly of experienced  					grandmasters and the pressure to win is also enormous,  					especially when you take into account the effect it could  					have on your Elo rating. Vassily Ivanchuk  					was not put off by this and went into this year’s Gibraltar  					Masters as the top favourite. However, it was another older  					star who set the pace at the beginning: Nigel Short  					won his first five games, against, among others, the two  					Kosintseva sisters and Pia Cramling.  But then in round 6 he  					came up against Ivanchuk, and his series of victories came  					to an abrupt end. With Black, the English player really set  					about his opponent right from the opening, but he was biting  					on granite. At the end he even got himself entangled in the  					Ukrainian’s mating net. Following this key game it was  					Ivanchuk who dictated the pace and conceded only one more  					half point against Mikhalevski. At the end he had notched up  					a fantastic 9 out of 10 and an Elo performance of 2968. And  					Short also rapidly recovered from his defeat and finished  					the tournament only half a point behind in second place  					thanks to another series of wins in the final rounds.  					  | 
  
                        Mikhalevski,V - Ivanchuk Position after 32.Nd3 |  					On this DVD you will find three games by Vassily Ivanchuk  					with extensive analysis. However, it is not his analysis but  					that of his opponents. But that too has its special charm of  					course. Through the explanations of Caruana, Mikhalevski and  					Roiz you will be able to construct a picture of Ivanchuk’s  					magnificent playing style.  
                        In the game  					Mikhalesvki-Ivanchuk there was a violent  					exchange of pieces in the King’s Indian. As Mikhalevski  					makes clear in his analysis, in this high class game both  					sides were walking along a very narrow path but both players  					kept on finding amazing resources. An example of that is  					Ivanchuk’s intermediate move 32...gxh3 in the position on  					the board on the left. Quite logically the game ended in a  					draw by perpetual check.  
                          | 
  Ivanchuk,V  					- Roiz,M Position after 23.Qe3
  |  					In the next round Ivanchuk confronted the Israeli GM Michail Roiz  					in a Semi-Slav with the rare move 5.Qd3. But Roiz came out  					of the opening well and thought himself to be reasonably  					safe after the tactical capture 19...Nxf4. But, as he admits  					in his analysis, this liquidation was based on a wrong  					evaluation of the resulting position. It was only when he  					reached the position on the board on the left after 23.Qe3  					that Roiz realised that White can create a safe shelter for  					his king with the move f2-f3, whereas the black king has  					always got to be on the lookout for attacks by the strong  					white knight. That was exactly what did it at the end. After  					an exchange of rooks Ivanchuk took command on the queenside  					and with the help of a knight fork on e7 he won the decisive  					extra pawn. Click on the link under the diagram and enjoy  					the amazingly easy way in which Ivanchuk completed his  					victory. | 
  
                        Caruana annotates: Caruana - Ivanchuk
  | Fabiano Caruana was for a long time amongst  					those pursuing most closely the dynamic duo. In the last  					round but one he had the chance to join the leaders when  					playing with White against Ivanchuk. But to do so he would  					have required a victory. Caruana tried to get one with the  					Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation. Invanchuk chose the setup with  					5...f6 and followed up with an innovation after 6...Bg4,  					namely 7...Qe7. In his analysis the Italian player  					criticises himself for having chosen at this point too slow  					a plan. In fact, after Ivanchuk’s 11...Qe6 he already found  					himself struggling to achieve equality. But that too went  					wrong. The Ukrainian not only took the initiative, but he  					also brought the white position to a state of paralysis with  					the help of a series of quiet and subtle moves. And finally,  					in a bad position, the c-pawn was also lost, the deciding  					moment. In his analysis, Caruana does not mince his words  					and all he says indicates his great respect for his  					opponent’s subtle positional play. | 
  
                        Nadezhda Kosintseva annotates   |  					In Gibraltar the ladies also provided some entertainment in  					the best sense of the term. For example, at the start  					Nadezhda Kosintseva kept up with Nigel Short step for step  					and after four victories the leading duo consisted of her  					and the English player. But in the long run it was not  					sufficient for one of the top placings, though she also gave  					a good account of herself against GMs such as Georgiev and  					Adams. On the DVD the Russian annotates her victory over the  					Indian GM Chanda Sandipan. Her sharp handling of the Najdorf  					Variation and the ingenious way she found to win in the  					endgame (25.Rb1) are things you must not miss. Kosintseva,N  					- Sandipan,C The best place was obtained by Nana Dzagnidze  					on 7 points and 6th in the order of merit on  					tie-break. The young Georgian grandmaster managed, for  					example, to notch up two wins over players who were almost  					over the 2700 mark (Vallejo Pons and Sasikiran). Of course,  					you will also find both games on the DVD.  | 
| 08.02.-16.02.2011   Le Quang Liem defends his title
  | Aeroflot Open Moscow  					The previous year’s winner Le Quang Liem was defending his title and once again won the  					Aeroflot Open. The Vietnamese player got off to an explosive  					start with four wins (including one against Gata Kamsky) and  					two rounds before the end he was already looking like the  					victor. But then he had to admit defeat against Cheparinov’s  					attack in the King’s Indian. Despite that a draw in the  					final round sufficed for victory in the tournament because  					the Bulgarian who was on equal points lost his game as White  					to Nikita Vitiugov. Vitiugov and Tomashevsky did then draw  					level on points with Le Quang Liem (6.5 out of 9) but had an  					inferior tie-break score.  | 
  Le Quang,L - Xiu,D 
                        Position after 18.Qe2-e7
  |  					The Vietnamese player (who has just turned 20) has annotated  					on the DVD two of his early victories in Moscow. Against the  					untitled Chinese player Deshun Xiu (Elo 2508) Le Quang Liem  					had to display his ability in the Ragozin Defence to the  					Queen’s Gambit. The Chinese player tried out the new 10...c5  					so as to immediately nibble away at White’s centre. Possibly  					too early, because the Vietnamese thwarted Black’s plan of  					development with the breakthrough 16.d5 and completely  					paralysed the black pieces (see diagram after 18.Qe7). Xiu  					saw himself forced to surrender his two minor pieces for a  					rook and a pawn after 18...Qxc3 19.Be4 Qc5, in the hope of  					being able to hold the position. But Le Quang Liem went on  					to win an exchange and finally liquidated to a winning rook  					ending. Play through the game and let the tournament victor  					from Moscow explain all the subtleties in the opening. | 
  Lenic,L - Le Quang,L 
                        Position after 17...Qd8 |  					In his next round game against the Slovenian GM Luka Lenic  					Le Quang Liem seized the sole lead and demonstrated how to  					be successful with Black in the Sicilian Defence when faced  					with the Maroczy setup. In the position on the board on the  					left the text move 17...Qd8 is the start of a long-term  					strategic manoeuvre: Black wants to exchange dark-squared  					bishops and to prepare that with the help of the moves h5,  					Kh7, Qf8 and finally Bh6. That is almost exactly what  					happened in the game. After the exchange of bishops, the  					Vietnamese thoroughly outplayed his opponent on the dark  					squares and ended the game in remarkable fashion with the  					tactical trick 42...Sh1 (see Rogozenco’ssecond introductory video). | 
|     Opening Trap Position after 8...Be7  					What should be done, or also – what should not be played?
  | From the opening trap to the endgame  					study  					Training in ChessBase Magazine begins with the very first  					moves and takes in all the phases of a game of chess. The  					14 up-to-date Openings articles with numerous ideas and  					suggestions for your repertoire can be foundhere 					or above amongst the links. 					This time Rainer Knaak’s opening trap (including its  					Fritztrainer video) contains a a trap from the Queen’s  					Gambit Accepted, see the diagram. The openings articles of  					Leonid Kritz (French Winawer Variation), Dejan Bojkov (Ruy  					Lopez Exchange Variation), Valeri Lilov (King’s Indian  					Attack) and Adrian Mikhalchishin (Sicilian Paulsen) have  					also been produced in video format. You will find these  					videos and another clip by Nigel Davies in Chess Media  					format in the column Fritztrainer. 					 					Peter Wells’ subject in his Strategy-column 					is called: "Doubled f-pawns in front of the castled king:  					Part 1 – The central significance of the safety of the  					king". In Daniel King’s long-running favourite Move  					by Move 					he deals with a game in the Grünfeld Defence. And in the  					columns for Tactics and Endgames 					Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller have once more selected for  					you all that is best in the latest tournament practice.  |